7 December 2025

PARIS WHEN IT SIZZLES: A PARIS PHOTO 2025 REVIEW

Tania Franco Klein, Dear Stranger (Self-Portrait), 2020. Courtesy of Rose Gallery.

Au fond de l'Inconnu pour trouver du nouveau!

– Charles Baudelaire, “Le Voyage”

 

Off again, to parts unknown. The humongous Paris Photo at the Grand Palais is a concert for the eyes, a tonic for the mind and, sure enough, a tribulation for the calves.

 

Thousands and thousands of images and multifarious expressions and endless ways of looking at the world and to create art, and yet what these pictures all have in common is a handy little “machine”:

 

“Only a few years ago, there was born to us a machine that has since become the glory of our age, and that day after day amazes the mind and startles the eye,” penned the Belgian artist Antoine Wiertz, one hundred and seventy years ago. “This machine, a century hence, will be the brush, the palette, the colours, the craft, the practice, the patience, the glance, the touch, the paste, the glaze, the trick, the relief, the finish, the rendering.”

 

I believe he was right. Camera work done well is almost everything that you can ever wish for as it draws you into the throb of life and humanity’s finer endowments.

 

In the days when the Grand Palais was built for the Exposition Universelle of 1900, photography was still relegated to the industrial sections of the world’s fairs. The French fairy of the Belle Époque must have roamed the magnificent Grand Palais to encourage its huge glass roof, the greenish tint of the framework and the lithe fluidity of the Art Nouveau-elaborated elements in plentiful supply. The building is so massively beautiful that Le Corbusier was about to destroy it in the mid-1960s, but death has never come to someone at a better moment. Today the Grand Palais is the flawless host of the most significant photo fair in the world.

 

“Since we came back to the Grand Palais, everyone’s happy, there’s no rain coming in, it’s clean and very nice,” says Howard Greenberg. “I started doing Paris Photo from the second one [1998], and for other reasons I’ve always been well positioned in Paris so I love coming here, it has always been successful for us. This year I was very insecure [chuckles] just because it’s so quiet in the photography business, even in New York. However, we are doing wonderful, like always. And for me, personally, reconnecting with a lot of old friends I haven’t seen in years sometimes is fantastic.”

 

“In terms of my opinion of the heart of the entire fair, it’s hard to say. There is so much work here, you know. A lot of the contemporary that I see, I really don’t know about – it might look good to me, it might not look good to me – but I am not going to give my opinion because I am not the person who knows about that world,” avers the famous New York photo gallerist (and gentleman). “From point of view of the look of the booths, I think it is the best Paris Photo ever. I think the photography people have really figured out how to make their booths look like art, and make Paris Photo look like an art fair – and that’s fantastic, that’s great. In terms of everything else, I don’t know … it’s good, it’s good.”

 

One of the finest displays at the 2024 fair was a bevy of black-and-white old splendour from two North American photographers, Todd Webb and Ernest Stone, care of Augusta Edwards in London. Edwards regards Paris Photo as the peak event of the year for photography, “and I feel everyone always puts their best foot forward and bring incredible material, and everything else that goes along aside it. And having the publishers, the talks – I mean, it surpasses everything.” When I imply that this year’s edition is such an improvement from the previous, she responds that “Yeah, it seems last year people were trying anything – anything goes – and this year feels more cohesive.”

 

Let us deal with PP24 for a moment since photography at that time was reaching a critical point where so many of its practitioners seemingly agreed to trash the medium’s inherent spirit, disposition and beauty. Simultaneously it was the year of that worthless thirty-second Jaguar commercial and the sheer artificiality of the eight woke clones and the five slogan puffs – “Create Exuberant”, “Live Vivid”, “Delete Ordinary”, “Break Moulds” and “Copy Nothing” – and all you could see was fakery, constraint, overprocessed digital junk and dead people.

 

The perfect photograph at PP24 for serving as an allegory, if unintentional, for the photographic medium’s worrying circumstances – doubting or even rejecting both imagination and visual truths (even though a photograph is never quite a mere copy of reality) – was the great and very friendly Belgian tableaux vivant artist Bart Ramakers’s image of a greyed painter at a sunset beach, with a ravishing naked young lady touching his shoulder for attention. However, what the geezer is actually painting is a man playing a grotesquely big alphorn, with the Alps as a backdrop. A scenery that has nothing to do with anything.

 

PP24 had a lot of things going on with photography doubting its very ground beneath. There were all these silly images of decoupaged foliage (etc) – sure done by darkroom methods peculiar only to photography, but at best decorative – that endeavoured to look like Pictorialism (an old branch of photography posing as something “better”). And then, inevitably, we were served something much worse – the plastic sheen of lost artistry. Remember what the cartoon boy said about AI in South Park: “Just because something is kissing your arse doesn’t mean it has good ideas.”

 

As Gerry Badger maintains in his book Collecting Photography: “No matter how technically inept, how lacking in considered artistic qualities, a photograph must always stop us short. It puts us into immediate touch with the long ago and the far away, with the quick and the dead.” Strolling from booth to booth at this year’s Paris Photo was like being in a better arranged universe; the muchness and the impressions of the pieces from 1,461 photographers, the polyglotism and the joy of meeting gallery people from various parts of the world who provided stories to the photographs that stopped me short in various grades of amazement.

 

A non-curated “theme” at PP25 was undoubtedly the images with a cinematic touch, and the finest of these booths was Rose Gallery’s exclusive presentation of the Mexico City artist Tania Franco Klein’s (b 1990) work of harrowing, yet beautifully-depicted non-places where each of these images is like a decoction of an entire film you want to find out more about, with some concerns. “We wanted to show her now as a solo exhibition because she has a piece in the MoMA show New Photography 2025: Lines of Belonging, and she’s at an installation at the Getty, so it kind of felt like this is the perfect time. She’s amazing!” says Sophie Winner from the Santa Monica gallery.

 

“This is a combination of many of her works. Tania does a lot of work involving different characters that she creates and who reflect the social anxieties that are imposed upon us right now, especially in her generation. Her latest series Rage™️ is the first time it is showing outside of Mexico. All of the different series build on each other, and this trademark takes the idea of rage and what it means and how it has become a charged word, and how that in itself is a reflection of all the anxiety and the rage that is built up between all of us. She’s taking that idea, and different aspects that come with that idea, and examines essentially what that word means. Everything is so meticulous, every last detail is played out, and she brings you into an entire world.”

 

With many of the American galleries not leaving home this year there was a definite lack of vintage prints at the Grand Palais. The most stunning ones were Todd Webb’s signed prints from Paris in 1950. Chantal Fabres of Augusta Edwards explains that Webb was a stockbroker who lost his money in the big Wall Street crash of 1929. “Then he did a bunch of odd jobs. He went to Detroit and took a photography class for Ansel Adams, with Harry Callahan in the same class, and he liked it very much. He moved to New York and met Stieglitz and Georgia O’Keeffe and he got into this world of photographers.”

 

“And then he was obviously drafted into the Second World War, but not as a photographer. After the war he moved to Paris for four years. Years later, he did the same thing as Robert Frank. Whereas Frank drove across the US, Todd Webb walked his pioneer trail from Oregon to California, effectively at the same time. There is a new book being published now by his estate. He printed everything himself – look, they are magnificent, aren’t they? I love them, they are so delicate.”

 

A good thing about PP25 was the numerous galleries from Japan, and that there are other things to display than Daido Moriyama’s fishnet tights. PGI in Tokyo is the second oldest photo gallery in the country and its director Sayaka Takahashi’s selection of superbly-crafted photographs just stopped me on the spot before a series of trees – grief manifested with such accuracy and quiet grace. Takahashi’s perception when she talks about these artists (chosen from marginal perspectives) is extensive. Her pain is sometimes tangible when the past comes up.

 

“Here is James Osamu Nakawa who is a Japanese-American photographer. He was travelling in the United States from 2022 and visited Japanese concentration camps. These pictures [Witness Trees series] are portraits of trees from these places. And these pictures are echoing Yasuhiro Ishimoto who was born in San Francisco and schooled in Japan, and he was interned [this was where he learned photography] when he returned. After that he went to Chicago and was educated by Harry Callahan. Ishimoto’s national ideas were Japanese, but he was also Asian American in his perspectives.”

 

Another great artist in the PGI booth is Yoshihiko Ito. “He belongs to a generation of konpora shashin – ‘konpora’ is short for contemporary in Japanese and ‘shashin’ is photography – and there was a movement in the late 1970s and 80s. Ito’s work is from the 1990s and he is really observing and is trying to deeply reflect how time persists in photography, and he sketches before he photographs. These are self-portraits with his shadow. He is one of the most important artists from the post-World War II generation and his works are iconic.”

 

And there’s a new series by Asako Narahashi called 1961 – They Were Standing There based on reeking negatives, full of damages, that the artist found one day. These are gifted snapshots taken by her father on a trip to East Germany through the Soviet Union sixty-four years ago, and the dreams they carry are despite of everything untouched. Takahashi guides me over to Kikuji Kawada’s Godzilla rendition of Goya’s Los Caprichos etchings, and she says that she wanted to show these works “because the world situation now is really complicated. And I wanted to do this in Paris since people in Europe have feelings close to us, even if Japan is kind of far from everywhere.”

 

Miyako Yoshinaga’s staffers calls for “Miyako-san” when I enter the NYC gallerist’s booth. She takes me to a series of mugshot-like close-ups of filmmakers such as Claude Chabrol and François Truffaut, shot by Ken Ohara at the New York Film Festival in 1970 for Harper’s Bazaar – the same year that his photobook One with five hundred faces of nameless New Yorkers was published. “The human sameness is the eyes and nose and mouth and eyebrows, but everything else has a little, subtle difference. Some people see them as individuals and some people see them as all the same, two different views shifting.” Yoshinaga says that she liked the idea of bringing this discovery to Paris where so many classic films have been made.

 

If the Chromotherapia exhibition at the French Academy at the Villa Medici in Rome this year was successful in any way, it was in how it showed colour photography’s progress from the early trials to its acceleration into garishness and vulgarity (save Guy Bourdin, if I dare to mention his name again). Two masters of colour that were not in that ho-hum “feelgood show” are Harry Gruyaert and Fred Herzog, whose images perked up the Grand Palais this year. German-born Herzog left Stuttgart and sailed to Canada in 1952, since “new, clean, safe and honest neighbourhoods do not give rise to interesting pictures”.

 

The only type of film he loaded his Leica with from 1957 and onwards was Kodachrome. Sophie Brodovitch, director of Equinox Gallery in Herzog’s beloved hometown Vancouver, explains that “All of these photos were slides and filed in his house in little slide drawers. And he would set up a show at home and project when we would go over– and we said ‘yes, no, yes, no’ – and that was the discovery process.”

 

“Many people know Fred Herzog through the books and he has had some exhibitions in Europe, but when they see the real pictures – that’s a point of discovery for them. After Fred died [in 2019], we were entrusted to manage all his photographic material, and within that there were a hundred thousand slides that we had not seen, and for five years we’ve been going through them, little by little, and narrowing them down to sixty-nine photographs which are presented here for the first time and which make up the new book that is just released.”

 

The colourful Enrica Viganò, founder of Admira in Milano, calls herself “a curator more than a gallerist” and her contribution to PP25 was one of the fair’s absolute wows. She clarifies that “This is a show curated around the theme of Neorealismo photography. The films are very famous but the photography needed to be known.” Admira had a show at the New York University in 2018 – Neorealismo: The New Image in Italy, 1932–1960 (along with a beautiful book with a preface by Martin Scorsese) – and the Metropolitan Museum of Art acquired ninety-three of these prints.

 

Signora Viganò says that for the Paris booth she wanted to display “not only the poverty of Neorealismo but also the désir de vivre, the desire for life” with walls of images “from Sardinia to Milano to the south of Italy”. “I visited one hundred photographers when I started in the 1990s. They were not well known and they did not think that they could sell to the collecting market. I found vintage print material that is amazing. If these photographers had been French, they would have been known as humanist photographers. Italians were not well known, but now after twenty years of hard work the Neorealismo photographers are really appreciated. My mission is ongoing.”

 

Another Milano gallery is Viasaterna, which was the most interesting of all the booths dedicated to performance-based photography, and they presented two female Italian artists who worked in the same cultural sphere: “Elisabetta Catalano was a Roman photographer who was very close to the artists of the Italian avant-garde and the Roman Pop Art movement, and she worked together with her partner Fabio Mauri for over thirty years. She was a very special photographer because she was not only a portrayer, she was a photographer who was able to stimulate the artists’ creativity into co-creating some performances,” says gallery director Carolin Mittermair in front of a couple of inspired portraits of Joseph Beuys and painter Cesare Tacchi.

 

“And in dialogue with Elisabetta we have Marion Baruch. She’s a Romanian-born artists who is ninety-four years old. Her work is related to textile, and she is famous for her huge installations where she also plays with emptiness. These are her early works from the 1970s, for example this one is Abito-Contenitore, a performance in which she wears this textile garment [an image where her figure is facing us with raised arms, but her shoes are pointing backwards] and she walks down Via Montenapoleone, the most famous Milanese fashion street on a sort of runway. We are in 1969 so there is also a sort of irony to her conceptual performance.”

 

Another one looks like the manifestation of the Aphrodite’s Child song “Loud, Loud, Loud” (recorded in 1970–71) – “The day the cars will lay in heaps / Their wheels turning in vain / We’ll run along the empty highways / Shouting, screaming, singing / Loud, loud, loud, loud” – and Carolin Mittermair explains that “the title of this performance is Contenitore-Ambiente [1971] and it was in fact a public action where she invited people to go inside these plastic spheres that were designed by Fronzoni. They were like a transportable environment, sort of a second skin, and she also wanted to stop the traffic so there is also some irony.”

 

An irritant from PP24 was how so many artists and galleries packaged their works in all sorts of silly frames and presentations, once again an indication of the medium’s self-doubt. This year, Casemore Gallery in San Francisco had two wonderfully big, aquatic prints by Kanoa Zimmerman, an American artist and a freediver based in Hawaii, with the frames very internal to the works in the most beautiful way: the prints sort of float in the frame, and the frames have the appearance of ship portholes.

 

The gallery’s representative, Chris Gunder, tells me that Zimmerman is in his early forties and that “he is still shooting black-and-white film, still developing in the darkroom himself, and prints on silver gelatin paper. And it’s so uncommon at this scale. The fact is that the film is not really designed to be blown up this large, so you get visible grain that almost feels like graphite.”

 

The remarkable Florencia Giordana Braun – who founded Rolf Art Gallery in Buenos Aires in 2009 (the only gallery in Argentina fully dedicated to photography), and who did her third round this year as a member of Paris Photo’s international committee – is an inspiration to all of us who love photography. There is passion, there is knowledge and there’s positive authority in everything she says and displays.

 

“We have the pleasure to represent two iconic pioneers of photography from my region: Sara Facio and Alice D’Amico, two radical women who not only produced wonderful work but also changed the way that we perceive photography in Argentina. Together they created the first editorial house for photography, La Azotea, and they also created the first association for photography in the country, the first photo gallery, and they created a collection of photography for Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes. Because the French government invited Sara and Alicia in the early 1950s to France, I think that they became very connected to this humanist approach to the urban landscape.”

 

“What we are doing here is to revisit their three iconic photographic essays. When they came back to Argentina, they did a beautiful photographic book titled Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires [1968], one of the first photobooks from Argentina, which was forbidden during the military process in the country. Humanario [1976] was also a very important photobook that they did about the inmates’ condition at the Borda Psychiatric Hospital in Buenos Aires. This book was also forbidden for a long time in my country, and it is still impossible to get it today.”

 

“We are also showing pictures from Autorretratos [1974], which was a book that they did that is gathering together their portraits of the most beautiful minds from Latin America – Argentina, Colombia, Uruguay, Chile. The book is an exchange of images and texts, and the most interesting thing is that these photos were taken here in France because most of these great intellectuals were in exile because of the situation we had. So for us it is wonderful with these two brilliant photographers in the show, and also to reunite them. Sara and Alicia were partners but they split in the early 1960s, and after that their archives were never shown together again. For the first time in sixty-five years, we are doing it here at Paris Photo.”

 

The PP25 directrices Florence Bourgeois and Anna Planes talked about “diversity” which in a Feminist frame of reference translates as women choosing women curators who choose women photographers who choose images of women. The Elles side dish was a particularly one-sided affair complete with word salad writing and female percentage scores regarding women in exhibitions, etc – the sort of self-serving sanctimony that never advances the culture of humanity. The long wall where you enter the Grand Palais, which is there to establish the tone for Paris Photo, was filled up with this year’s winner of the Hasselblad Award, Sophie Ristelhueber.

 

“To stand in the darkroom and watch your pictures slowly appear from sheets of white paper is a magical experience. With flashes of light, chemicals and formula, photography is a kind of sorcery,” suggests John Ingledew in The Creative Photographer. “The fact that photographs can stop time by preserving moments that have now passed is itself extraordinary.”

 

Paris is where this sorcery all began – when Niépce met Daguerre at Charles Chevalier’s optician’s shop at the corner of Quai de l’Horloge and Place du Pont Neuf, near the equestrian statue on Île de la Cité. These men were scientists, inventors and instrument makers. Then came the painters, like Charles Nègre; the illustrators, like Charles Marville; and the poets, like the fantastic Atget.

 

Photography originated less than a kilometre from the Grand Palais and this is exactly what Paris Photo should show on the big wall in 2026. A salute to the quick and the dead.

Gyula Zaránd, Enfants de la rue VIII, 1964, Budapest. Courtesy of Galerie Waltman.

Sante Vittorio Malli, When Snow Means Bread. Milano, 1956. Courtesy of Admira.
  Paris Photo at the Grand Palais in Paris, November 12–16, 2025.

27 September 2025

THE PILGRIM AND THE STARS

Photo: Anders Petersen.

Photo: Anders Petersen.

The way I walk is just the way I walk / The way I talk is just the way I talk / The way I smile is just the way I smile

 

– Jack Scott, “The Way I Walk” (1959)

 

The lessons that you are meant to learn, the hardships to be triumphed over when you nurture the strength to stand alone and grow in the darkness. And then the other essence in this life – the fire of meaningful human connection with those who point out the absolute necessities for growth, the things that you have perhaps never seen or heard before, whether it is through art or this scarce thing called affection.

 

Two minutes into The Cramps’ sublimely phantasmagorical though very, very real performance at the Napa State Mental Hospital north of San Fracisco on June 13, 1978, singer Lux Interior addresses his unusual audience with the utmost form of tenderness: “Somebody told me you people were crazy, but I’m not sure about that. You seem to be alright to me.” And then the band kicks in with “The Way I Walk”, this ode to selfhood and the right to carry yourself with conviction and moral stance, no matter the peculiarities. The fact that a girl from The Cramps’ tour entourage was warned by the inmates not to dance too blissfully to this song, as “you might wind up being here”, is evidence enough that this world was just built for a certain type of people.

 

When I met Anders Petersen (b 1944) for a substantial text in L’Oeil de la Photographie in 2019, the Swedish maestro explained that a major incentive for his photography is to experience what’s behind all the closed doors: “The more you are out and meet people, you discover that we are one large family and that we are not so different. We are relatives, the whole bunch, and that is the very underpinning of everything. And if you hold that belief it is fantastic to see how many doors that are opened for you. And it is important that the doors are being opened because I am not so interested in superficial things. Other people’s concerns are also yours. You must remember this and not be too much dazzled by the exterior. In order to make good progress you have to enter. And when you come in, things will happen.”

 

In his book Documentary Photography, Arthur Rothstein delineates how a new photographic idiom was well under way in mid-century United States, pictures that were far from the cosy stuff of Family of Man (1955): “These pictures, seemingly haphazard and elementary, showed America in the most ordinary, commonplace, and even banal activities. Yet, they were intensely disturbing and personal. They were views in ordinary public settings of sadness and disenchantment that had never been presented before.”

 

There is a deep-seated discipline in Anders Petersen’s directly-lived and involving photography suggestive of Robert Frank’s great journey across the US in 1955–57 with a 35mm camera – which of course became the much-celebrated photobook The Americans – since both of these photographic worlds are highly spiritual, physical, emotional, psychological, and made with effort, courage and intention.

 

Their ways to interact with reality couldn’t be more of an opposite, however: whereas Frank’s attitude towards his work was fuelled by political acerbity (“I don’t have any respect for anybody in front of my camera. I use them. I manipulate them to suit my purposes. I don’t tell the truth”), Petersen’s images are the ones teeming with reciprocity and belonging (“I’d rather be someone’s fellow man than someone’s photographer”), and what he is looking for is fundamentally refinement. It is the refinement that comes from other people when they sharpen us by challenge.

 

In The Bad and the Beautiful (2020), Helmut Newton is heard saying that he uses the camera as a shield between himself and what he sees. For the past decades, Petersen’s camera of choice has been the pocket-sized Contax T3. But whatever camera he works with, it is first and foremost used as a key to human interaction. What transpires between the photographer and the people he is portraying is vulnerable friendship, verisimilitude, a sense of yearning and a sacred trust that make Petersen’s images special and distinct. Yet the greatest beauty in his portraits is that this is a family of people who leave something for themselves, the residual mystery that Walker Evans argued made the best photographs.

 

Never before shown pictures (lush darkroom prints adeptly done by Nikko Knösch) from the three clusters of work jointly known as Anders Petersen’s “Institutional Trilogy” are now on show at Nationalmuseum in Stockholm. These are images from Prison (1981–84), On the Line of Love (1989–91), Petersen’s work from an elderly care centre, and No One Has Seen It All (1993–95), his touching account from a mental institution – together with an overwhelming cinematic interpretation of Petersen’s work by Swedish-born filmmaker Johan Renck. It was Renck’s suggestion to name the exhibition The Left Shore – most likely after Ed van der Elsken’s bohemian photo-novel from Saint-Germain-des-Prés, Love on the Left Bank (1956) – and it was Petersen’s curatorial partner Angie Åström who brought them together.

 

“I became interested in a certain type of photography that touches me and that I never tire of but keep coming back to. That is how I feel about Anders’s pictures, you always find new stories in them,” explains Angie Åström. “This is also about Anders’s new way of looking at the pictures because it has been so long since the books came out. So this is like experiencing the series anew, in another form. This is an entirely different approach where you are able to regard the pictures more as standalone works.”

 

John Keats wrote to a friend in 1817 that “I am certain of nothing but of the holiness of the heart’s affections and the truth of the imagination.” The trilogy that very much resonances with Keats’s sentiment is presented in three burgundy-painted cabinet rooms, one for each series, and the display goes from salon hang to a tight grid. “It is nice to see these pictures again. There are so many memories associated with the people, above all. I stayed in these places for a long time, two and a half or three years on each project,” says Petersen. “I remember the names of almost all of them, and they are people who stay with you throughout your life.”

 

Among the pictures in the first little room with the series from the senior centre in southern Stockholm (nicknamed the “Castle” in the book), Petersen picks out two of these souls who have remained with him, though it was several decades ago since they left this mortal world: “Elsa, she is ninety-four years old here. When I came in to see her, she offered me a glass of sherry, and she had a record player and put on a waltz and we started dancing. There were many older gents who liked her. And this is Bert, a wonderful man, a gentleman. He used to go to [the amusement park] Gröna Lund when he was a bit younger to dance, and he was a charmer.”

 

Anders Petersen mentions Bruce Davidson’s East 100th Street (1970), with continuous compassionate emotion, and Davidson’s wonderful faculty to balance his technical skills (these pictures were shot with a really large camera) on top of his temperament and curiosity, and the American photographer’s ability to listen. “It is about the identification process again, you see yourself – and of course you are scared. I am anxious most of the time, but it is okay to be scared. You just have to deal with it. One way is to be able to photograph it, it’s a foothold for yourself,” reveals Petersen. “What’s important is that the audience or viewer can identify with these people so that the situation doesn’t take over, that there is compassion – all the time – as an opening to be able to understand and feel and gain more knowledge, to be able to grasp it and deal with the situation. Surely, isn’t that so?”

 

In this cabinet with people who nowadays live on in the memory layers of silvered gelatine is a print of a woman with a vacuum cleaner hose over her shoulder, and a ghostlike manly figure with Brezhnev-thick eyebrows in the background. The old woman’s glower is so bleak that it makes Åström remark that “I think it’s a bit funny because here she is glaring at the photographer and is a bit moderately annoyed …”

 

“No, excuse me!” Petersen leaps in (and note how he is speaking of these people as if they were still alive). “She’s not annoyed at all – no, no, no – not in the slightest. I know her well, and she is a determined, loving person who has worked in healthcare for thirty years. I went up to her and asked her – and she had seen me walking around there for about six months – if I could take her portrait. ‘You can,’ she said. Then she just stood there and looked straight into the camera. This is a person who knows what she’s doing, and she loves it. She loves people. I liked her very much and I like the picture; it is a true depiction of her and her pride and self-assurance. But her gaze is not to be trifled with.”

 

When Richard Avedon presented his Nothing Personal in 1965, he employed the decade’s graphical lingo of dynamic sentiments in black-and-white, in this particular book with pictures of the unjustly rich sided by individuals locked away in mental asylums.

 

“I believe I was drawn to them for their fire. The honest, purposeful self-examination of a traumatised life creates a heat so exquisite that it burns away the usual appeasements, self-deceptions, and defences,” argues Martha Stout in The Myth of Sanity. “As a psychologist, and as a human being, I am impressed with the irony that these severely traumatised patients, people who have been through living nightmares [often] become the true keepers of the faith and are the most passionately alive people I know.”

 

Even in No One Has Seen It All, Petersen succeeds in his very own photosynthesis to convert darkness into rampant, effulgent life – even though he had to take a long break at a certain point as he realised that he was losing his clarity of vision, that his work had become reportage. In the country where the ultimate violation is to question the swallowers of slogans, and where every accomplishment above mediocrity is stymied and met by odium, it is a boon to encounter these mental patients who have turned their pain into armour. Here you will meet the woman with a medallion filled with pictures of herself and a personal autonomy so obvious that Nurse Ratched would have thrown in the towel.

 

There exists a picture taken by Gisela Kluge of a dark-haired Anders Petersen in a mod-like hairdo and a black leather jacket, having a conversation with an old lady at the Café Lehmitz in 1970. Behind him in the fabled Hamburg bar are two bottles of beer and his Nikon with the big F on the bow, the tool that he used to shoot one of the most famous photobooks of our time.

 

The Café Lehmitz project started in 1967 when Petersen was a student at Christer Strömholm’s Fotoskolan in Stockholm but spent much of his time in the louche parts of Hamburg, specifically in the St Pauli-Reeperbahn area where he soon became on equal footing with a tribe of friends who lived their lives in ways that most people would never understand. All that is left of this today (when even the bar is gone and replaced by Motel One Hamburg am Michel) is this masterpiece. Photographed long ago when Petersen was in his mid-twenties, Café Lehmitz appears to have become the kind of impediment to him as Fritz Lang’s success noir M (1931) was to Peter Lorre – something that he just has to live with for the rest of his life.

 

Some of the most interesting individuals that Petersen encountered in Hamburg in the late 1960s were men who had done terrible things and spent many years under lock and key. One of them suggested that Petersen should try to photograph the world inside a prison. Another incentive for the first series in Petersen’s “Institutional Trilogy” was Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s television series Berlin Alexanderplatz (1980) which commences with the character Franz Biberkopf, fresh out of prison, and all the adversities that he has to face just to endure this new life in “freedom”.

 

The American photographer Paul Strand said that “Photography is only a new road from a different direction, but moving toward the common goal that is life.” In the beginning of the 1980s, Petersen was authorised by the famous prison warden Annbritt Grünewald to spend his days (which became years) inside the seven-metre-high walls of the Österåker Prison north of Stockholm. The Prison series is the hardest one to scrutinise in the exhibition since it looks so breathable and almost innocent in comparison to the evil mayhem that Sweden is today, less than half a century later.

 

“I found Anders in Paris because he had an exhibition there at his gallery, Galerie VU’. I also found his books at the Centre Pompidou,” tells Angie Åström. “When I moved back to Stockholm, I felt that I wanted to do something else so I contacted Anders and asked if we could meet. At that time, this was in 2013, he was working on an exhibition at the Bibliothèque nationale de France. And then we met. We started hanging out, and I often got quite annoyed about things like the fact that so few Swedish photographers are shown in Sweden, that people are not proud of them, and that they haven’t taken care of Anders. Then I started thinking about how we could do an exhibition, linked to Swedish conditions.”

 

That first exhibition was Stockholm at Liljevalchs City Art Gallery in 2019, which grew and grew for years to become the largest photo show ever produced in Sweden, and it sure worked magic. When Åström contacted Johan Renck about a possible synergy at Nationalmuseum, he responded not only once but twice. The question came to me, and it was obvious. I would do anything to be close to Anders Petersen,” says Renck who was the one who directed David Bowie’s last music videos – “Blackstar” (2015) and “Lazarus” (2016) with Bowie in an old hospital bed, literally facing death as he was taking his last dance steps in a 1974 costume. (Bowie died on January 10, 2016, only two days after his sixty-ninth birthday.)

 

There are two beautiful publications from Gösta Flemming’s Journal Photobooks related to The Left Shore exhibition: Early Portraits with pictures from Stockholm and Hamburg, 1967–70. There is a marvellous maturity in these works that waver between the advantages and disadvantages of being under Christer Strömholm’s guidance. While this young photographer took a lot of pictures that were deeply influenced by Strömholm’s profoundly symbolical imagery, surely with an undertone to please his father figure, most of the pictures in this book is Anders Petersen finding his way as he is unlocking the world with a camera.

 

Early Portraits comes with a C stamped on the thick red back cover. The C tagging routine was Christer Strömholm’s idea of student endorsement: “He marked a C on the few photos he could come to terms with,” Petersen disclosures in the book. “I copied several of the negatives marked with C, small strange and hard images that were really just imitations of Christer’s own. They were vulnerable, and I liked them. But they felt as if they didn’t belong to me.” It is quite revealing that only a few of these Christer-approved images have been chosen for this elegant volume.

 

The second book is called The Left Shore: Johan Renck Meets Anders Petersen, and Flemming says that “This is not an exhibition catalogue, but rather a spinoff in which Johan has selected images from Anders’s entire body of work, which Anders and I have then compiled in this publication so that you can bring home something from this exhibition, if you wish, since it summarises what is on display here.” This selection of pictures is arguably darker as Renck has emphasised unsmiling faces, agony, raw sex and people in beds.

 

“There is a stillness and a purity in Anders’s pictures. I am probably a little darker than Anders, I think. I am drawn to a slightly more dramatic darkness,” confesses Johan Renck with a smile. “I’m a big admirer of Anders’s pictures and I don’t know why. It’s my taste and the kind of material that I am drawn to. I’m close to photography itself, so I probably see it with such eyes.”

 

“It was a pretty general idea that we would do something together,” he continues. “I have always been a great admirer of still images, and the fascination with the frozen moment versus the moving image is interesting. I have previously worked with still images and tried to translate it into cinematic material, but never in this way. It was about taking Anders’s work and make it move, perhaps devising a before and after of the frozen moment that the image represents. The only thing that is real is the image that Anders has taken; now the images are shifting and it is completely fictionalised.”

 

What Petersen and Renck do have in common is their capacity to see beyond the curtains of collective agreement – the fragile, the dreary, the broken, the against-all-the-odds beautiful – but there is nevertheless something in Renck’s work that leaves you flustered since his sincere sagacity is so often hampered by a weakness for surface darkness. “What’s so fun about this is that the images come to life. I am unsure after I’ve seen the film – is this how the images are supposed to look? But I think it is exciting that the images take on a new identity,” says Angie Åström about what is going on in the first room of the exhibition.

 

There is a mediocre film called The Childhood of a Leader (2015) and the grandiloquent score by Scott Walker just kills the little that is good in it. The screen at the Nationalmuseum exhibition is big and wide and Krister Linder’s score is loud and overpowering (though not bad at all in itself), and you get so confused by the gloomy editing of the rubberised pictures that are floating by that it almost takes the whole run of the film to figure out that everything that you have witnessed is a show of almost one hundred pictures from Anders Petersen’s career of lived photography.

 

When I met Petersen in his Old Town lab in the summer of 2019, he told me that the clue to his magic “is about taking the time, both as a human being and a photographer, and not looking for the spectacular and dramatic situations. Because if you do, you will end up in a photography that easily depicts the superficial. I am looking to find a photography that unites people instead of isolating them. I want to obtain a photography that people can identify with and recognise themselves in. And when it comes to people, there is no better way than to just sit down and talk with them, it is that simple. You must absolutely have a curiosity that is true and correct, otherwise it doesn’t work.”

 

And one more thing: “There is always hope, not just in the pictures but as a rule.”

Photo: Anders Petersen.

Photo: Anders Petersen.

Anders Petersen and Johan Renck: The Left Shore at Nationalmuseum in Stockholm through January 11, 2026.